arrow-downarrow-rightburgerchev-downclosedepartmentdownloadexternalglobeloaderlocationloginmagnifiersearchuser facebooklinkedintwitterxingyoutube atbechczdeesfrgbhuieitnlplsk

Perfect chemistry – overcoming procurement challenges

In this blog, we’ll explore common procurement challenges in the chemical industry, examining how strategic procurement and digital solutions address issues like raw material sourcing strategies, volatility in raw material prices, and supply chain complexity.

Scientists working on their computers in modern laboratory

Elemental considerations

The chemical industry is vast and varied, requiring companies to navigate procurement strategies tailored for chemical companies. At the same time, supply chain resilience in chemicals is critical, particularly with fluctuating costs and shifting geopolitical pressures in Europe.

For chemical companies to thrive, among other things, they need to procure specific quantities of raw materials at the right price, as well as meeting specification and quality criteria. According to McKinsey, purchasing spend is the equivalent of up 20–60% of sales revenue for specialty chemical players and up to 80% for makers of commodity products.

While the wider global market for raw materials has undoubtedly shaken up supply chains, the potential for profits to be eaten up here is immense, especially considering raw-material pricing volatility and global instability. And that’s before we’ve even touched on the issues around indirect spend.

So let’s take a closer look at some of the challenges procurement teams within these organisations are facing, and how a more strategic approach can deliver cost-savings, supply chain resilience, and innovation at the same time.  

What are the challenges facing the chemical industry?

Researcher watching chemical reaction after adding test material into flask

Product complexity

Sourcing raw materials is increasingly complicated due to price fluctuations. This volatility in raw material prices demands that procurement teams develop both sustainable practices in procurement and long-term solutions to manage supplier reliability.

This comes largely from the fact that customers are requesting niche products, which impacts what materials are needed as well as the profitability of inflexible production systems.
The products are also complex. While a company might only need to procure a relatively small number of different raw materials (10–20), accounting for over half its spending, there are a number of important decisions to make: where a material is bought from, the form it’s bought in, and its grade or quality. All of these decisions have a knock-on effect when it comes to the cost of processing.

There's added complexity due to global sourcing markets. Prices can be highly volatile, making timing critical for procurement teams. Import duties and exchange rates play an important role in the attractiveness of certain markets and need to be continuously monitored. On top of this, suppliers from newer markets, like the US and China, need to be thoroughly researched to ensure suitability.

Streamlining tail-end spend in chemical procurement involves consolidating suppliers where possible and leveraging digital tools for spend analysis and contract optimisation. Companies implementing sustainable practices in procurement can also extend their efforts to these categories by prioritising suppliers with strong environmental and ethical credentials.

Effective management of the long tail not only supports supply chain resilience in chemicals but also aligns with broader business goals, including cost reduction, operational consistency, and sustainability.

Index-driven pricing

Somewhat contradictorily, the prices of many raw materials are largely determined by standardised indexes, reflecting broader market trends, benchmark values or industry-specific economic indicators like production costs and supply and demand dynamics.

Many companies will use these indexes as benchmarks when it comes to negotiating prices. But this can oversimplify the procurement process, which requires expertise to navigate a range of variables, relationships, and strategic considerations beyond straightforward index pricing. As a result, many companies won’t invest in the expertise and tools their procurement function really needs.

Two factory workers or inventory inspector conduct professional inspection on chemical barrels in warehouse

Long tail of lower-volume products

On top of the base raw materials chemical companies need to procure, there are potentially thousands of additive ingredients essential for fine-tune products. Many of these materials fall into tail-end spend in chemical procurement category - items purchased in small amounts or rarely used. Managing this category effectively can drive efficiency and cost savings while reducing supply chain fragmentation.

These smaller-volume products often need to be delivered in numerous combinations of packaging and labelling to meet customer specifications. This creates challenges in strategic procurement for chemical companies, such as inventory management, process standardisation, and compliance with quality controls. This complexity can lead to inefficiencies and higher operational cost, without a clear strategy.

Beyond raw materials, indirect procurement in the chemical sector encompasses essential operational needs, from laboratory supplies to the maintenance of production machinery. With multiple locations and diverse teams to support, ensuring a standardised approach to indirect spend is critical to avoiding maverick buying and improving resource allocation.

Overworked procurement teams

It's clear, all of the above has resulted in an increasingly high workload for procurement teams. Beyond resource allocation, procurement professionals need to have a deep understanding of the technical and supply-market intricacies in their niche categories as well as more efficient systems for their indirect spend. Strong analytical and strategic skills are a must – which can be tough to guarantee in a time of skills shortages.

Woman scientist in laboratory for medical study

Striving for a more sustainable future

Innovation in chemicals and introducing sustainable procurement practices can help chemical companies to drive sustainability, but there are a number of factors that make this easier said than done, in particular ensuring sustainability across complex global supply chains, from raw material extraction to end-product delivery. There’s also the inherent environmental impact of processes and products, which could require substantial changes – and investment – to improve.

A more sustainable approach to procurement relies on investing in research, navigating regulatory landscapes, educating end-customers about more sustainable choices, and engaging suppliers committed to environmentally friendly practices. To achieve the latter, businesses need to be able to efficiently assess and ensure suppliers’ sustainability credentials – even trickier when a diverse range of suppliers are being used.

How can procurement play a strategic role in tackling these challenges?

Strategic procurement is at the heart of addressing these challenges. But organisations have to recognise that role in the first place and start seeing and treating procurement as a vital and strategic function in the company.

Procurement initiatives can not only contribute significantly to financial performance, reducing overall spending, but can improve supply chain resilience, boost sustainability efforts and drive innovation. And making indirect procurement more efficient is one of the keyways businesses can alleviate procurement workloads and start focusing on more strategic efforts.

Chemical organisations paving the way are measuring success in terms of operational and technological excellence, scale effects, integration and raw material availability, reliability and low-cost logistics, as well as keeping complexity to a minimum.

When it comes to procurement, they’re building long-lasting and balanced relationships with suppliers for both their direct and indirect needs. These are relationships where safety, reliability, competitiveness, and innovation are prioritised alongside ethical practices and sustainable development. And strategic decision-making is built on solid business understanding and spending transparency.

Start with segmentation

One of the ways chemical companies are succeeding with procurement strategies is to segment their sourcing categories according to how important and valuable they are to the business.

All materials can be divided up into strategic (the small number of commodities that represent the biggest part of your business’s spend), critical (the ones you spend less on but are essential to business as usual), and tail end (the remaining lower volume, less important products). Understanding where every commodity fits will help you develop sourcing strategies, such as total cost of ownership analysis and best cost country sourcing.

Next, to take a comprehensive approach, you should look at key levers – commercial, technical, and demand – to optimise purchasing processes.

  • Commercial levers – rather than only relying on contract and supplier management for purchasing direct materials and indirect assortments, prioritise renegotiating agreements during significant market changes and define contract terms to mitigate against price volatility. Most likely, the price of your strategic and critical commodities varies dramatically around the world, depending on quality, availability, energy prices, and local demand. With a robust understanding of the global marketplace and strong analytical skills, you’ll be able to identify genuine opportunities, rather than having to resort to strong-arming your suppliers.

  • Technical levers – making more of changing product specifications or grades and getting to grips with suppliers’ production costs and capabilities can help you achieve substantial savings. Perhaps you could adapt processes to use different raw materials, modify product recipes, or dynamically adjust ratios in response to price changes?

  • Demand levers – this revolves around your own production processes, whereby enhanced coordination across your sites or business units can lead to significant saving opportunities. Standardising packaging, for example, or centralising inventories can make a huge difference. Different parts of the business might be using the same raw material from different suppliers, where one lower-cost supplier would suffice. Looking for alternatives to adjust or eliminate demand might require some investment (in new equipment, for example), but has the potential to lead to long-term savings.

There are big gains to taking this approach, not least the typical savings businesses can expect when it comes to base commodities as well as indirect categories. A more strategic approach with specialist knowledge and intelligence gathering can give your chemical business a more holistic picture of its supply chain and supplier landscape. It will also enable you to have a smarter, more structured approach to negotiations.

Take your strategy to the next level

At Unite, we're already helping large chemical companies to streamline their procurement strategies and build more resilience into their supply chains.

With a European-wide presence, it’s ideal for businesses wanting to roll out a digital solution across multiple locations and divisions. Offering both standard and specialty product ranges to fulfil indirect procurement needs, all our suppliers are vetted, so you can rest easy knowing they’ll adhere to your compliance guidelines too.

Procurement strategy with Unite

With just one system for all your indirect needs, processes are streamlined and you can keep on top of invoices. Beyond time and cost-saving, Unite’s reporting functionality means you can easily analyse data to prioritise your sourcing and procurement strategies.

Learn more about on how we can help you overcome common industry challenges.